Cartesian doubt is methodological. Its purpose is to use doubt as a route to certain knowledge by finding those things which could not be doubted.[3] The fallibility of sense data in particular is a subject of Cartesian doubt.[3]

Descartes's method

René Descartes, the originator of Cartesian doubt, automatically put all beliefs, ideas, thoughts, and matter in doubt. He showed that his grounds, or reasoning, for any knowledge could just as well be false. Sensory experience, the primary mode of knowledge, is often erroneous and therefore must be doubted. For instance, what one is seeing may very well be a hallucination. There is nothing that proves it cannot be. In short, if there is any way a belief can be disproved, then its grounds are insufficient. From this, Descartes proposed two arguments, the dream and the demon.[2]

The dream

Descartes, knowing that the context of our dreams, while possibly unbelievable, is often life-like, hypothesized that humans can only believe that they are awake. There are no sufficient grounds by which to distinguish a dream experience from a waking experience. For instance, Subject A sits at her computer, typing this article. Just as much evidence exists to indicate that her composing this article is reality as there is to demonstrate the opposite. Descartes conceded that we live in a world that can create such ideas as dreams. However, by the end of The Meditations, he concludes that we can distinguish dream from reality at least in retrospect.[2]

The demon

Descartes reasoned that our very own experience may very well be controlled by an evil demon of sorts. This demon, or genius, is powerful enough to control anybody. He could have created a superficial world that we may think we live in. [2]

Eradication

Descartes believed that doubt can be erased by studying the "first person".[clarification needed] This heralded the term "cogito ergo sum" – "I think, therefore I am". [2]

References

  1. ^ "A Philosophical Glossary" edited by Justin Leiber, Philosophy Department, University of Houston, USA.
  2. ^ a b c d e Roger Scruton. Modern Philosophy: An Introduction and Survey. London: Penguin Books, 1994.
  3. ^ a b "Cartesian Doubt and Cartesian Rationalism" Prof J. Strayer
Philosophy portal
Philosophy
Western philosophy · Eastern philosophy
History
Ancient Buddhist · Chinese · Greek · Hellenistic · Hindu · Indian · Jain · Persian
Medieval Scholasticism · Thomism · Scotism · Early Islamic · Judeo-Islamic
Modern Empiricism · Rationalism
Contemporary Analytic · Continental
Lists Outline · Topic · School of Philosophies · Glossary · Philosophers · Movements
Branches Metaphysics · Epistemology · Logic · Ethics · Aesthetics
Philosophy of Action · Art · Biology · Chemistry · Film · Education · Economics · Environment · Geography · Information · Healthcare · History · Human nature · Humor · Language · Law · Literature · Mathematics · Mind · Music · Being · Philosophy · Physics · Politics · Psychology · Religion · Science · Social science · Technology · War
Schools Africana · Anarchism · Aristotelianism · Averroism · Avicennism · Classical liberalism · Critical theory · Cynicism · Deconstructionism · Deism · Deontology · Dialectical materialism · Dualism · Egoism · Epicureanism · Epiphenomenalism · Existentialism · Feminism · Functionalism · Hedonism · Hegelianism · Hermeneutics · Humanism · Idealism · Kantianism · Kyoto School · Legal positivism · Logical positivism · Marxism · Materialism · Modernism · Monism · Naturalism · Neoplatonism · New Philosophers · Nihilism · Ordinary language · Particularism · Peripatetic · · Phenomenology Platonism · Posthumanism · Postmodernism · Post-structuralism · Pragmatism · Presocratic · Process · Psychoanalysis · Speculative RealismSolipsism · Realism · Relativism · Scholasticism · Skepticism · Stoicism · Structuralism · Thomism · Utilitarianism
Portal · Category · WikiProject ·

Categories: Epistemology | Skepticism

 

The above information uses material from Wikipedia and is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Some facts may not have been fully verified for accuracy. [Disclaimers]
This page was last archived by our server on Tue Nov 17 04:19:57 2009. [ refresh local cache ]
Displaying this page or its contents does not use any Wikimedia Foundation's resources.
The owners of this site proudly support the Wikimedia Foundation.


If we put everything [e.g. God] into doubt, what then will be our concept of God?
Q. My question is doubting the Cartesian God. How did he ever come up to a concept of God when he even doubted his own concept?
Asked by Alwele P - Thu Dec 28 06:05:54 2006 - - 8 Answers - 0 Comments

A. DOUBT-FUL
Answered by small - Thu Dec 28 06:15:43 2006

Yahoo Answers Search: Cartesian doubt,
Sun Nov 8 16:15:34 2009