kolokacja jpg
304px x 360px | 15.20kB

[source page]

Kolokacja serwerow Kolokacja serwerow jest us ug oferowan przez dostawcow internetowych serwerownie Kolokacja polega na hotelingu czyli przechowywaniu i opiekowaniu si serwerem klienta Klient

What is the definition of a disease, and specifically a mental disease? Has science truly failed?
Q. I think this is the biggest failure of science and generally the world. It is full of imperfections, even though religion is not a better alternative. But, what can you define as a disease; and what can you not? First of all, we have to realize that all humans are different physically. But they should be treated equally on moral basis, and on the basis of humanity (whether its gay ppl, straight ppl, women, old ppl; they should be treated equally on moral grounds). Because people are different physically; they exhibit different behavior due to the chemistry of their body. Here is where the tricky part comes. What can you categorize as an illness/disease/disorder and what can you not? This is the biggest failure of science: why do you need… [cont.]
Asked by watashikoini - Thu Nov 20 08:44:41 2008 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments

A. I am sure you feel much better for that little rant, which, if I understand it aright, implies that nobody is responsible for any of their actions, which are determined entirely by their body chemistry. If that is what you believe, then you will be when understanding when I come and burn your house down because that is in my body chemistry. In fact society has evolved through an understanding of appropriate relationships between its members (understanding the concepts of right and wrong confers a benefit on the members, even at the expense of a limitation of freedom). I will happily give up the freedom to murder you for the benefit that you no longer have the freedom to murder me. Society now has to deal with those who transgress the… [cont.]
Answered by Peter H - Thu Nov 20 09:36:07 2008

What is the definition of a disease, and specifically a mental disease? Has science truly failed?
Q. I think this is the biggest failure of science and generally the world. It is full of imperfections, even though religion is not a better alternative. But, what can you define as a disease; and what can you not? First of all, we have to realize that all humans are different physically. But they should be treated equally on moral basis, and on the basis of humanity (whether its gay ppl, straight ppl, women, old ppl; they should be treated equally on moral grounds). Because people are different physically; they exhibit different behavior due to the chemistry of their body. Here is where the tricky part comes. What can you categorize as an illness/disease/disorder and what can you not? This is the biggest failure of science: why do you need… [cont.]
Asked by watashikoini - Thu Nov 20 08:50:38 2008 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments

A. I'm at uni doing a bachelor of health science and the definition of 'disease' is just a condition that has recognisable symptoms/effects especially treatable ones... whereas non-treatable is typically called a syndrome. In response to your other topics... they all fall into the 'grey' areas. How do we know if something is right or wrong, ethical or not? Is it opinion or intrinsical fact? The fact is our society and all of its laws are built on certain peoples perceptions and beliefs and the only thing we can really do is look to God for the absolute truth and do the best we can along the way. My biggest issue is psychologists and even GPs shoing medication in everyone's face. Something may be a disease and they may have studied that… [cont.]
Answered by unknown - Thu Nov 20 08:57:24 2008

What is the definition of a disease, and specifically a mental disease? Has science truly failed?
Q. I think this is the biggest failure of science and generally the world. It is full of imperfections, even though religion is not a better alternative. But, what can you define as a disease; and what can you not? First of all, we have to realize that all humans are different physically. But they should be treated equally on moral basis, and on the basis of humanity (whether its gay ppl, straight ppl, women, old ppl; they should be treated equally on moral grounds). Because people are different physically; they exhibit different behavior due to the chemistry of their body. Here is where the tricky part comes. What can you categorize as an illness/disease/disorder and what can you not? This is the biggest failure of science: why do you need… [cont.]
Asked by watashikoini - Thu Nov 20 08:45:20 2008 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments

A. They are faulty premises, you are correct, however they are your faulty premises, not the medical communities'. This is a question that the medical community asked it's self in the 1960's and came out with a good answer. It was acknowledged that people are, in many areas, an unbroken spectrum, and so the only way to classify a pathology is put some cut off point. This cut off point is based on suffering. A human is in a pathological state if they have some biological abnormality (significantly divergent from the average healthy physical state) that causes themselves or others to suffer (or would cause them to suffer if untreated). So homosexuality is not a pathology because no one suffers (assuming the society is sensible), and because… [cont.]
Answered by Zondi - Thu Nov 20 09:16:58 2008